Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 82.9 against 77.4. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is incredibly newer, but way thicker and notably heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same pixel density, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a bit larger display.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3700mAh battery size. The Google Pixel 4 XL shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality pictures.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4 XL is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.