Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Moto Z3's score of 77.6. Google Pixel 4 XL is a newer device than the Moto Z3, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z3, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a better screen pixels density.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a back-facing camera with a higher resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Moto Z3 has a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z3 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with greater battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z3, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.