Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the Moto Z3 Play, getting a global score of 82.9 against 76.3. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little faster processor than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a little sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit bigger display, more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 4 XL features a slightly better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a camera with a higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a much better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.