Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 general score. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL and Motorola One Action were only released with a couple months difference, the Google Pixel 4 XL construction is somewhat thinner but also a little bit heavier.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better display than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a little bit greater pixels count in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a back facing camera with a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture. Motorola One Action counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola One Action, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.