Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a a bit thinner and a little lighter phone than Motorola One Hyper, even when they were only released 1 months apart. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040px resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola One Hyper has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Motorola One Hyper has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs more than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.