Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 general score. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is newer, a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Google Pixel 4 XL. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better processing unit than Motorola razr (2020), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger screen, a higher pixels amount per display inch and a lot higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. Motorola razr (2020) features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4 XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 4 XL, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.