Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Google Pixel 4 XL is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features improved battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better video definition, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Google Pixel 4 XL is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.