Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 82.9 score against 77. Despite being the best in this review, Google Pixel 4 XL's design is a little thicker and a little bit heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a display that is just as good as Google Pixel 4 XL's display, because although the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a way better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.