Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, getting an 82.9 score against 82.1. Google Pixel 4 XL is an noticeably older phone than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, but it is a little lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a way greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Google Pixel 4 XL's one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A13 5G features greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Galaxy A13 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.