Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having an 82.9 score against 77.4. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL is notably older than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's body is a little thinner and a little lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Galaxy A15 5G features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. The Galaxy A15 5G has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.