Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22's 76.1 global score. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A22, but it's just a bit heavier and was released around a year before. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better processor than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels quantity per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Google Pixel 4 XL takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A22 features much more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.