Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. Galaxy A22 5G is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 4 XL, although it's a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A22 5G features much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.