Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is a little thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a display that is very similar to the display in Google Pixel 4 XL, because although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much worse pixels count per inch of screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a very superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy A25 5G has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A25 5G has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. Galaxy A25 5G has a superior camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos and a tinier camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.