Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 XL design has the same thickness than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is a bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. Galaxy A35 5G has a much greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A35 5G has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery size. Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.