Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 general score. The Galaxy A50 construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 4 XL, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A50 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.