Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, with an 86.6 score against 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50s design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 4 XL, although both were released with only a couple months difference. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a better display pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s features just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.