Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, having a 90.8 score against 82.9. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G and the Google Pixel 4 XL were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy A51 5G design is just a bit lighter but a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy A51 5G features much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G features improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 22% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.