Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, having a 90.7 score against 82.9. Samsung Galaxy A52's body is newer and a bit lighter, but just a bit thicker than Google Pixel 4 XL. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better pixels count in each inch of display. The Galaxy A52 counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A52 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A52 counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.