Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than Google Pixel 4 XL's general score of 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is newer and just a little lighter than the Google Pixel 4 XL's, but it is a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a way better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has greater battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.