Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting an 82.9 score against 76.9. Even being the best we compare here, it must be told that it's also a just a little heavier and a little thicker cellphone. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a higher screen density.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Google Pixel 4 XL captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger sensor shooting better quality photos.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A70, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.