Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy C7's 77.7 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is notably newer than Galaxy C7's, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL has a better display than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a higher display pixel density, a bit larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Galaxy C7 counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C7 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 12% larger battery size. The Google Pixel 4 XL captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.