Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a score of 97.6 against 82.9. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and Google Pixel 4 XL were released with only 1 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is noticeably heavier but somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also counts with a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Fold features just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4 XL. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 4 XL, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.