Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's global score of 82.9. Samsung Galaxy M51's body is newer than Google Pixel 4 XL's, but it's just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M51 has a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a lot more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.