Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4 XL, but it's just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP, a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features superior battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4 XL, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.