Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. Although the Google Pixel 4 XL is way newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a just a little greater screen density, a little bigger display and a little bit higher 1440 x 3040px resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4 XL also counts with a back-facing camera with more megapixels.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.