Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's global score of 82.9. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a a bit thinner and somewhat lighter device than the Google Pixel 4 XL, even though they were only released 8 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 3040, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also counts with a quite higher display density.
The Galaxy S10 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S10 and Google Pixel 4 XL have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with less mega pixels, and they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also counts with a bigger aperture.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.