Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, with a global score of 93.6 against 82.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and Google Pixel 4 XL were only released 5 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G construction is a bit thinner but also just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and Google Pixel 4 XL have very similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, the Google Pixel 4 XL also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S10 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a worse resolution camera, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy S10 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.