Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a score of 86.3 against 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than the Google Pixel 4 XL, although both were only released with a couple months difference. The Google Pixel 4 XL and the Samsung Galaxy S10e count with similar processing units, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a bit better pixels count in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy S10e takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4 XL has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy S10e is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.