Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 score. Although it's the best phone in this review, we must highlight that it is also heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1440 x 3040 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 MP resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4 XL. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.