Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.81 ounces | -- |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Galaxy S25, getting a score of 82.9 against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a little smaller display, a just a little worse pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 counts with a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 4 XL is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.