Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, getting an 82.9 score against 79.5. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a extremely newer phone than Samsung Galaxy S7, but it's a bit thicker and extremely heavier. The Galaxy S7 features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and more processing cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S7 and Google Pixel 4 XL count with very similar cameras, because although the Galaxy S7 has a less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy S7, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.