Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with a general score of 82.9 against 81. Even when Google Pixel 4 XL and the Galaxy XCover Pro were released with only a couple of months difference, Google Pixel 4 XL is somewhat lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher pixel count per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. Google Pixel 4 XL and Galaxy XCover Pro both feature really similar cameras, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same video definition, it also counts with a much more MP back camera.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs more money than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy XCover Pro, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.