Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, with an 85.6 score against 82.9. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer device, and it's also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Google Pixel 4 XL. Galaxy Z Flip 3's processor is very similar to Google Pixel 4 XL's processor, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher screen density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Google Pixel 4 XL captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a more mega pixels camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4 XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4 XL, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.