Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a general score of 94.6 against 82.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than Google Pixel 4 XL, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 22 percent more battery size. Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a worse 12 MP resolution camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4 XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.