Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, with a 91.1 score against 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is somewhat heavier but a lot thinner than Google Pixel 4 XL. Google Pixel 4 XL features a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1968 x 2184 and a way worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back camera with a much higher 200 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 19 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4 XL. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.