Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the Xperia XZs, getting a score of 82.9 against 77.2. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction has the same thickness than Xperia XZs, but it is heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little bit better screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a better pixels density, a bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Xperia XZs has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cores.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity. Xperia XZs takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with faster video frame rate, a camera with lot more MP and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.