Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having a score of 82.9 against 78.7. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4 XL is extremely older than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate and a back camera with a much better 108 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.