Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, having an 82.9 score against 82.2. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and both were only released 4 months apart. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.