Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's general score of 82.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4 XL, but it is a bit lighter. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's CPU is very similar to Google Pixel 4 XL's processing unit, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a little larger screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4 XL, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a worse video resolution, a lower 12 MP resolution back camera and a tinier aperture, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs more money than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.