Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's 76 global score. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is way newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's, but it is heavier and a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a greater screen density, a bit bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger number of faster cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a bigger aperture to take better photos in low light situations.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.