Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having an 82.9 score against 78.2. The Google Pixel 4 XL is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Poco M3, but it's just a little lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco M3 takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.