Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 82.4. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a a bit heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but they are equally thin. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lot lower pixels density and a much lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features improved battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.