Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's global score of 78.2. Google Pixel 4 XL is an older and a little heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but Google was able to build it just a bit thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 4 XL captures slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a much lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
The Google Pixel 4 XL and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S count with very similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.