Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 general score. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design is just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 4 XL. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 3040 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 39 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.