Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | -- |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's general score of 77.1. Google Pixel 4 XL has a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a much bigger camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.