Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's global score of 76.6. Although Google Pixel 4 XL and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 were released only 7 months apart, Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 128 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a lot better 48 MP resolution back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. If you want to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.