Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 81.1. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with greater battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.