Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a global score of 82.9 against 80.2. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3700mAh. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has higher video frame rate and a camera in the back with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.