Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having an 82.9 score against 78.1. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better phone than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, we must tell that it's also an older, just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier phone. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's processing unit is very similar to the Google Pixel 4 XL one, and although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4600mAh battery size. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4 XL is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.