Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a global score of 85.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4's global score of 81.9. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a incredibly heavier phone than Google Pixel 4, but they are 0.32inches thick. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution, a little greater display density and a little bit bigger screen.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Google Pixel 4 one, they have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max takes just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 4, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.